113 Fulton Street, Suite 721
New York, NY 10010
+88 (0) 101 0000 000

7 Most Common CDR Report Mistakes Made by Applicants for Skill Assessment

7 Most Common CDR Report Mistakes Made by Applicants for Skill Assessment

7 Most Common CDR Report Mistakes Made by Applicants for Skill Assessment

If you’re an engineer looking to migrate to Australia or New Zealand, you must pass the Competency Demonstration Report (CDR) assessment. However, many applicants must correct their CDR report mistakes, which can avoid rejection. 

Engineers Australia’s Skills Assessment Test is required to move to Australia and work as an engineer. A CDR report is a set of documents that indicate an engineer’s qualifications, experience, expertise, knowledge, and skills. Many engineers also write their CDR without prior working experience.

We recognize that you are a candidate from a prestigious field. Writing a brief report is simple. In this instance, CDR is a difficult task. Making frequent mistakes while writing a CDR report is unavoidable, regardless of whether you are competent to pass.

A competency Demonstration Report gets written so that it can get accepted. Thousands of CDR applications get rejected yearly due to minor faults in CDR report writing.

Minor inaccuracies can lead to a negative evaluation outcome; candidates got prohibited for a year in a few situations. Furthermore, you may jeopardize your chances of pursuing a successful job if you make these mistakes.

As a result, you must carefully write a Competency Demonstration Report. Engineers Australia publishes a guidebook outlining the CDR application guidelines and frameworks, including structure, episodes, language, word count, and many other elements.

In this blog, we’ll outline the seven most common CDR report mistakes applicants make and provide tips on how to avoid them. Following our advice can increase your chances of success and help you achieve your dream of working as an engineer in Australia or New Zealand.

Most Common CDR Report Mistakes Made by Applicants

Here’s a rundown of some of the applicants’ typical errors while preparing a Competency Demonstration Report for the Engineer Australia Skill Assessment:

Most Common CDR Report Mistakes Made by Applicants

1. Writing a Career Episode about a group activity

The most typical blunder people make when describing how their group or team worked on the project, solved problems and performed tasks. CDR, on the other hand, is intended to evaluate your abilities rather than the teams’.

It evaluates what you did on that project, what your job was, how you accomplished it, +how you collaborated with others, and so on. As a result, write your Report in the first person, emphasizing what you (I) personally accomplished rather than what your team (WE) accomplished.

2. Division of one project into two Career Episodes

When writing Career Episodes, many people make the error of dividing the same endeavor into two pieces and including each portion in its Career Episode. Engineers Australia requires that you explain one complete project in each Career Episode.

For example, A Mechanical Engineer created his Career Episode based on work completed during his Engineering Course’s seventh and eighth semesters. The main goal of this task was to develop and simulate a wind turbine. 

When she was in the seventh semester, she completed his first project. The project entailed gathering data, writing a literature evaluation, and designing the wind turbine’s procedure. As a result, she talked about this project in his first Career Episode.

In the eighth semester, you completed the second project. The project aimed to study the designed wind turbine, test it, alter it, and produce a design and simulation report. As a result, in the second Career Episode, she needs to write about this effort.

Even though these two projects had separate grades and got completed for different objectives during his academic career, EA considers them to be elements of the same project because he completed both projects to build a wind turbine.

Based on the first portion of the project, you completed the second part. As a result, EA views this as a single project you met in two parts. And you should only talk about it in one Career Episode.

For Example, An academic project completed throughout his engineering studies gets discussed by a mechanical engineer. You completed the project in a group, and different aspects got distributed among the team members.

The group worked on a project involving wind turbine design and modeling. You separated the tasks into four categories: literature review, design calculation, project design, project analysis, project modification, component selection, project fabrication, and project testing or implementation. The mechanical engineer is involved in the following project as part of this project:

  • Design of the Project
  • Analysis of the Project
  • Selection of the components
  • Testing or implementing the project

So, rather than describing the work done by the group to complete the project (literature review, design calculation, design work, analysis, fabrication, modification, testing, and implementation), she needed to describe their roles and responsibilities (design work, analysis, selection, and testing) in his Career Episode. Only include group activity if you have enough projects for Career Episode.

Consider the following example:

She wrote:

Design work that we completed in software using mathematical calculations for design work. For the design job, we employed a variety of tools such as lines, spline, extrude, sweep, and so on. We used the Creo Parametric 2.0 design program to complete the project.

She should have written:

I used the Creo Parametric 2.0 design software to complete the project. The software’s design work get based on mathematical calculations, and the diagram depicts the final design. Lines, spline, sweep, extrude, and I used other Creo tools in the design.

Learn More: Who is eligible to apply CDR for Skilled Visa Migration? ✈️✈️

3. Grammatical, Spelling Errors and Report Formatting

When you present the EA with your CDR report, you submit an official document that a professional should have created. You must pay close attention to its layout, spelling, punctuation, and sentence flow in your CEs. It is an area that many people overlook.

Make sure the flow of sentences is correct, such as spelling and grammar mistakes. These are little errors, but they significantly impact your grade. Because you are submitting your Report as a professional, it should appear written by one.

4. Plagiarism from samples available online

You should never submit plagiarised CDR. The CDR Sample supplied by various sites is for educational purposes only. Engineers Australia employs a variety of tools to identify plagiarised content. So, you’ll get caught whether you did it on purpose or by accident. Read the sample, take notes, and create your Career Episodes on your Projects like the CDR Sample.

5. CDR in different languages

A CDR in a different language is one of the common CDR report mistakes. Engineers Australia requires that you deliver your CDR report in English. So, cdr in a foreign language is a big NO. Please speak Australian English and do so correctly. If you composed your Career Episodes in a language other than English, you must translate your Report into English since EA may only review your CDR report if they understand it.

6. Use of excessive technical details

Including some necessary technical information in your projects is fine, but having too many technical details, such as computations, charts, tables, pictures, and so on, on every project event decreases the Report’s quality. A CDR should provide concise rather than lengthy and detailed details that readers would find dull. Using excessive technical detail is one of the common CDR report mistakes.

7. Not following the structure of the report

When writing Career Episode, the first paragraph should be an introduction of roughly 50 words, followed by a background paragraph of 200 to 500 words, a body and main paragraph of 200 to 500 words, and finally, a summary of Career Episodes of 50-100 words. Here is where you can learn more about the CDR Guidelines.

Learn More: Electrical Engineering Scope: Is it worth migrating to Australia ✈️✈️

Additional CDR Report Mistakes Made by Engineers

8. Lack of information

One of the CDR Report Mistakes Made by Engineers is that they need to mention information like duration, address, company profile, and project objective. This material must be included and presented in chronological order. You have to retain this information in your Report.

You must choose a decent project to include in your CDR report as part of your educational certification. If your plan does not stand out enough, it may get rejected. Similarly, your application may get hampered if you suggest project objectives that do not satisfy the criteria.

9. Information presented using the bullet point

It is a typical mistake that many individuals make when preparing CDRs. Many people provide important facts as bullet points, which should get presented as paragraphs. Engineers Australia considers it to be one of their most essential needs. So, in sections, fully explain your statistics and other facts so that it is easily understood. Avoid CDR report mistakes by presenting details in paragraphs.

10. Word Count

Engineers Australia has specified the number of words submitted in each part of the CDR Report. Each Career Episode must be at least 1000 words and no more than 2500 words long. You’re offering extra information, and lengthening your career episodes won’t help you achieve a positive rating.

As a result, you must select and present essential data to meet all of Engineer Australia’s standards. You may find more information on the appropriate length of a CDR report online, find it out to avoid CDR report mistakes.

11. No details about the Design Activity

Design Activity is significant. In the CDR evaluation, design activities get given a high emphasis. A lack of design experience could make it more difficult for your CDR to be accepted. As a result, showcase any innovative engineering and technological experience with developing activities to avoid CDR report mistakes.

12. Not mentioning Problem Statements

This statement is a critical component of the CDR Project. The facts of the projects you worked on and what you accomplished should focus on your Career Episodes. Include problem statements and the measures you took to solve them in your CEs.

13. A vague/ erroneous summary statement

Before you begin drafting the CDR report, remember that it has three main sections: a Summary Statement, three Career Episodes, and a Continuous Professional Development (CPD) list. Each has an important role to perform in the CDR report.

A crucial CDR component is the summary statement, which provides cross-references for all career episodes. Most assessors will read the first page, which indicates your ability to evaluate data and form first impressions.

14. CPD (Continuing Professional Development) is misguided

Engineers Australia requires a Continuing Professional Development (CPD) report for Migration Skilled Assessment. CPD includes the following features:

  • Detailed information on official postgraduate study
  • Attendance at workshops, seminars, and short courses
  • Participation at conferences
  • Internships or volunteer work
  • The training’s date, title, length, and location must get recorded via CPD.
  •  If your Report’s Continuing Professional Development section is accurate, your CDR will be accepted.

15. Project selection could be better.

You must select a decent project to include in your CDR report as part of your educational certification. Otherwise, it can lead to CDR Report Mistakes. If your plan does not stand out enough, you may get rejected. Similarly, your application may get hampered if you suggest a project that does not match the requirements.

Learn More: Who is eligible to apply CDR for skilled visa migration? 🧑🏽‍✈️🏆

Wrapping up

A CDR rejection can result in a one-year Engineers Australia ban, which means you won’t be able to submit your CDR assessment that year. After that, it’s over, so you have a year to review your Report, identify any flaws, and make improvements before reapplying. Your writing should be very comprehensive and must follow the MSA booklet guidelines.

If you disagree, you can also request a review through a formal appeal or an informal request. You have three months to file a legal complaint, after which Engineers Australia will examine it for six months. On the other hand, an informal request should be submitted within three months, although it will take eight weeks to complete.

Candidates who need clarification about where to begin should seek professional advice. Our experts are already familiar with the CDR report, so they can provide information to help you. We give free cdr report samples and ACS RPL report samples to make it easier for you. Until recently, we had a success rate of about 99 percent. We guarantee a high-quality CDR Report with original content. CDRReportWriters provides the best CDR report-writing services.

Our team of professional Writers, Experts, Engineers, IT Specialists, and others deliver high-quality CDR Services to the applicants. We help candidates from all around the world who want to work as skilled professionals in Australia.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *